Megapixels
Posted in Tech Stuff on 04 Apr 2008 at 16:52
One of the simplest and most well known equations in the electronics world is that Bigger numbers = Better. 2 gigabytes, or 2,000 megabytes of RAM in a computer, is much better than a mere 256mb and a 2GHz processor could wipe the floor with a 400MHz cpu of old.
However, take that 2GB of RAM and use a rubbish memory management system, then you might barely match the performance of a 512 machine that’s efficient with it’s memory use! Whilst it’s true that 2GB is better than 512meg, that comparison is only true when each is pitched fairly against each other… ie. it’s not the only factor in good computer performance!
The same can be said for the size of the CCD on modern digital cameras. 6 megapixels is, on paper at least, considerably better than 2mp, and a 10 megapixel beast is better still! Unfortunately though, the CCD is just one small component of the camera. And despite what the retailers would have you believe, it’s not nearly the most important.
In fact, the number of megapixels on your camera pretty much only defines how large you can print or view your photos. Simplified, there are about 1.3 million pixels on the average computer monitor (1280×1024), so a photo from a 1.3 megapixel camera could, in theory at least, be viewed at full screen on your average monitor, with no loss in quality. Any more pixels and the monitor must start merging them to render the image, which actually begins to compromise the quality that you see. For viewing on your monitor, the benefits of 6 megapixels over 1.3 are hard to see.
When printing, the difference is easier to see because printing machines work at much higher resolutions. But for most people, printing at 6″x4″, 2mp will be more than enough. A 3 megapixel camera will normally print up to about 7″x5″ and so on.
On the face of it then, the more megapixels, the better the quality. No?
Nope. As I said before, it only affects the size you can print to without seeing any decrease in sharpness. The quality of the photo depends on the camera. Specifically the lense, the focus, the camera settings, conditions and of course, the photographer!
The most important piece of kit (if you ignore the guy operating it) is by far and a way the lense. This is what focuses the image onto the CCD in the first place, and thus what determines the sharpness of the image you get out at the end. That’s why my 3.2mp compact takes much better photos than your 5mp mobile phone. It’s also why a 6mp DSLR produces sharper images than the 8 or even 10mp compacts you can get these days.
It’s probably clear by now, that for you and me, 5 maybe 6 megapixels is more than enough in a decent camera. The only conceivable reason to put that same CCD in a mobile phone though, is that bigger numbers = better in just about everyone’s head. Whilst you and I may know that such a CCD in a phone is comparable to polishing turds, your average consumer will be drawn in by the big numbers and just assume that it’s better.
Essentially, a little more money on the CCD means a lot more sales, even if the pictures aren’t any better at all.